Using a telescope to see the moon's surface? - 114mm telescope pictures
I'm looking forward to this new and need some advice from experts in the field of astronomy. I intend to buy the telescope TWINSTAR brand 114mm objective mirror, focal length 500 mm, the F-ratio 4.4, eye, 25mm and 10mm Plossl eyepiece lens and 2xBarlow ..... Filter moon telescope is good enough to see pictures of the surface of the moon and other planets like Saturn, Jupiter, etc. ... Please give so that you can buy .....
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
114mm Telescope Pictures Using A Telescope To See The Moon's Surface?
5 comments:
As others have noted, the telescope is more likely that a piece of scrap.
Here are some websites with good information on beginner telescopes:
http://www.gaherty.ca/tme/TME0702_Buying ...
http://www.scopereviews.com/begin.html
http://observers.org/beginner/jrfbegi ...
For more extensive information, read Phil Harrington Starware, 4 Edition (Wiley).
You get the best value for your money with a Newtonian reflector on a Dobsonian mount, such as the following:
http://www.telescope.com/control/categor ...
... http://www.skywatchertelescope.net/swtin
Buy from a store that specializes in the purchase telescopes and astronomy, either locally or online, not in department stores, discount stores or eBay, as is everything they sell junk. Find your local astronomy club and try different telescopes at one of its groups of stars:
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community ...
I would recommend against it. Each field is in the '114mm 'size printout is a complete piece of junk in my experience.
A Meade 8 "LightBridge Dobsonian telescope tube truss will be much better:
1) Type Dobsonian telescopes do not have Polarstern targeted simply refer you to where you want to see. The installation is less than 5 minutes, rather than adapt to the polar area every night.
2) 8 "mirror gives you a much more light gathering power! Light gathering power is on the surface of primary mirror / lens. These are the circles so that the equation is pi * r ^ 2 (pi times r squared) 8 . '= Pi * (4 ^ 2) = Pi * 16 ... 4.5 "= Pi * (2.25 ^ 2) = Pi * 5, an 8" telescope has 3.2x the power to collect the light!
3) The LightBridge is better. The 12 "and 16" mirror version is very popular in my group of astronomy, everyone loves him! For us, quality means quality of the optics (see clear), Quality Framework (verrry sweet and pleasant to use it), and the quality of the tthat (components very professionally done, it looks pretty good).
Yes, it is more expensive than buying a LightBridge scope, but in reality the Lightbridge telescope is a "real" and the thing is a toy. Do not waste your money, you can not see anything with him.
My first is a range of 4.5 "of ice is a scope. I paid $ 600 for him, was carried out and had all kinds of things that their luxury was ... a piece of crap I have to upgrade a 10" Newtonian Telescope and paid $ 650 for the ... I'm awesome views and photos.
Garbage. avoided like the plague. The most important question for me is the point: it is impossible to make a cheap f/4.4 mirror.
Please note Orion Star Blast or a similar telescope in place. a little more money you can get a telescope more.
Find a discussion about the brand here Twinstar - http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/s ...
You're not impressed, unfortunately ...
Hope this helps!
It seems to be about $ 150, is a 4.5 "(114 mm) reflector. Eyepieces with 2 so that 20x and 50x, with 2X Barlow - 40x and 100x. So far so good Supplied. He has a tripod d, and has an equatorial mount. You can choose an engine unit for $ 50 more. Otherwise, it's not really about, and it would be better fitted with a more stable Dobsonian style. It is a moon filter. The filter reduces the Moon, the amount of light in. This view is even more acute.
You can use the craters of the moon in detail very well. Saturn now (better) at 5.30 clock time is a point ahead of the Rings. You can to see, but the details for a while. You will see the largest moon of Saturn. Jupiter shows the area bands, the 4 largest moons - but perhaps not the Great Red Spot. Not a very high contrast in the afternoon. Mercury is a point of Venus shows a half-moon, Uranus is a very small slice of color is Neptune, a colored dot. Stars, double stars, a dozen or more groups. TopRI areas of light pollution, see M31 (galaxy) and M42 (fog), but you have to look very dark sky in other galaxies or nebulae. The field is too small to oxygen 3 filter.
Twinstar is a premium brand. Although it was packed with accessories appropriate (for example, is not 600x) will be considered, an area very cheaply. At least the eyepieces 1.25 ".
I have not used this field. The main thing is to be feared, is the stability of the saddle. I used areas, like him, and was the main topic. You have to touch the level of development. If it is ten seconds to adapt to high performance, the object is no longer in the field of view. And it is useless in windy conditions.
I think it is pointless, only that it would be better to be born with a pen. The cheapest I recommend SCOPE is StarBlast. It is also 4.5 "(114 mm), but based on a simple Dobsonian mount mounted. Never will be taken, but are less frustrating to use.
\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ u0026lt edit;>
I have clouds the discussion. The classic quote is: "It worked very well for an outlet." This praise is odd. POS is an acronym that means "cheap toy" instead of "performance-oriented instrument. But the night of the debate is difficult to follow clouds. Half of the responses of the time talking about other instrument.
Post a Comment